Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.

Publication:
Policy Options for Turkey: A Critique of the Interpretation and Utilization of PISA Results in Turkey

dc.authorscopusid26632835000
dc.authorscopusid54886203200
dc.authorscopusid54885293600
dc.contributor.authorGür, B.S.
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Z.
dc.contributor.authorÖzoǧlu, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:28:57Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:28:57Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Gür] Bekir S., Department of Mechanical Education, Karabük Üniversitesi, Karabuk, Turkey; [Çelik] Zafer, Department of Sociology, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Özoǧlu] Murat, Samsun Vocational School, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this article we provide a critique of the interpretation and utilization of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) results by the National Education Authorities in Turkey. First, we define and explain what OECD's PISA is. Second, we make an overview of the media coverage in Turkey of the PISA 2003 and 2006 results. Third, we present the way in which Turkish officials have interpreted and used PISA 2003 and 2006 results. By examining the public documents, such as official reports or news bulletins published by the Ministry, we conclude that the educational authorities had already decided to proceed with reform of the old curriculum much before the PISA 2003 results were out, and they made use of the PISA 2003 results to justify the curriculum reform. Finally, by presenting the policy recommendations of Turkey's national reports and articles as well as the international organizations, such as the World Bank and OECD for the Turkey's educational system, we question the suitability of various policy recommendations developed for Turkey based on PISA results. Based on a comparative analysis of PISA, Third International Study on Mathematics and Science (TIMSS) and national exam results, the authors conclude that the issue of providing quality education should not be reduced only to the form and quality of the curriculum. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02680939.2011.595509
dc.identifier.endpage21en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-0939
dc.identifier.issn1464-5106
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84855507954
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.595509
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000302149000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Education Policyen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Education Policyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCritical Analysisen_US
dc.subjectOECDen_US
dc.subjectPISAen_US
dc.subjectTurkish Education Policyen_US
dc.titlePolicy Options for Turkey: A Critique of the Interpretation and Utilization of PISA Results in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files