Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.

Publication:
In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Modified Plating Techniques for Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Advancement

dc.authorscopusid13105607600
dc.authorscopusid55427793800
dc.authorscopusid35335969500
dc.authorscopusid13406241900
dc.contributor.authorŞener, I.
dc.contributor.authorArc, S.
dc.contributor.authorBereket, C.
dc.contributor.authorTek, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:17:59Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:17:59Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Şener] İsmail, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Arc] Selim, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bereket] Cihan, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Tek] Mustafa,en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of modified plate techniques using a newly designed three-dimensional test model after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Fifteen synthetic polyurethane mandibular replicas were used and divided into 3 groups. Self-tapping 6-mm titanium screws with an outer diameter of 2.0 mm and private designed plates produced by 316-L stainless steel were used in the study. After the osteotomy, the distal part was advanced by 5 mm. The jaw models were placed to the three-dimensional test model designed by the authors, and the Instron Lloyd LRX device was used to apply a double-sided tensile force from the mandible angulus region of each group. Resistance forces that caused a displacement of 1.5 and 3 mm were recorded with the Instron program. The mean (SD) of the 3 groups were calculated using analysis of variance and the Tukey test. The results were compared statistically, with values of P < 0.05 determined as statistically significant. On the basis of the results of the Tukey comparison within the groups, there was a statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 and between groups 1 and 3 at both 1.5-and 3-mm displacement (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between groups 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). This test modelwas able to identify the most appropriate plate type of 3 different modified plate techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Copyright © 2012 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826100ec
dc.identifier.endpage1576en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22976664
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84867777623
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1573en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826100ec
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000309547200144
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Advancementen_US
dc.subjectSagittal Split Ramus Osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectThree-Dimensional Test Modelen_US
dc.titleIn Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Modified Plating Techniques for Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Advancementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files