Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.

Publication:
Clinical and Radiological Features of Patients with Right Aortic Arch

dc.authorwosidAkan, Hüseyin/Afu-2969-2022
dc.contributor.authorFindik, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorErkan, Levent
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorAkan, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorAtici, Atilla Guven
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Merve
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Findik, Serhat; Erkan, Levent; Uzun, Oguz; Atici, Atilla Guven; Bayrak, Merve] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Tip Fak, Gogus Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological features of the patients with right aortic arch who were diagnosed in our clinic between July 1st, 1998 and December 31st, 2003. The files and records of 13524 patients seen in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed to identify the patients and all the data including demographic characteristics, history, physical examination findings, radiological findings, results of spirometric studies and bronchoscopies. Eight patients (0.06%) were diagnosed as having right aortic arch and comprised the study group. The study group included 6 male and 2 female patients aged 25 to 70 years with a mean age of 45. Four patients were symptomatic. Among them, two patients presenting with effort dyspnea and one patient suffering from dry cough had been diagnosed as bronchial asthma and had been receiving relevant treatment. At the end of radiographic, spirometric and bronchoscopic studies it was understood that their clinical pictures were due to compression of trachea and right main bronchial system by right aortic arch and its components. Symptoms of one symptomatic patient were due to small cell lung cancer. On thoracic computed tomography, the subtype of right aortic arch was identified as right aortic arch with anomalous left subclavian artery in seven patients (87.5%) and right aortic arch with mirror image branching in one patient. In our study, right aortic arch was diagnosed in 0.06% of the patients seen in our clinic, a ratio that is lower than reported in the literature. Right aortic arch with anomalous left subclavian artery was the predominant type of right aortic arch. Although it was reported in the literature that right aortic arch rarely causes symptoms in adult population, it caused symptoms in three of the eight patients (37.5%). Therefore, we suggest that differential diganosis of the patients presenting with effort dyspnea and dry cough must include right aortic arch.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.endpage18en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-7808
dc.identifier.issn1308-5387
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/37789
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000421579800004
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherBilimsel Tip Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRight Aortic Archen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectSpirometryen_US
dc.subjectDyspneaen_US
dc.subjectCoughen_US
dc.titleClinical and Radiological Features of Patients with Right Aortic Archen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files