Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.

Publication:
Morphological Measurement and Anatomical Variations of the Clivus Using Computed Tomography

dc.authorscopusid57028394100
dc.authorscopusid57210663500
dc.authorscopusid8411499400
dc.authorwosidSerindere, Gozde/Hph-0265-2023
dc.authorwosidAvsever, Hakan/Aaq-7750-2020
dc.contributor.authorSerindere, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorAvsever, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:42:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Serindere, Gozde] Hatay Mustafa Kemal Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, TR-31060 Antakya, Turkey; [Gunduz, Kaan] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Samsun, Turkey; [Avsever, Hakan] Hlth Sci Univ, Gulhane Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the clivus morphology, including fossa navicularis magna (FNM), canalis basilaris medianus (CBM), and craniopharyngeal canal (CC), on computed tomography (CT) images. Design This is a retrospective study. Setting Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. Participants The CT images of 500 patients (253 males; 247 females) were evaluated. Main Outcome Measures The prevalence of FNM, CBM, and CPC; the length, width, and depth of FNM; and CBM types were recorded. Also, a morphological analysis of the clivus (length of the clivus, angle between the clivus and the posterior margin of the foramen magnum, angle between the clivus and the dens axis, and anteroposterior diameter of the foramen magnum) was performed. Results FNM was identified in 5.4%, CBM in 4%, and CC in 0.8% of the study group. Type 5 CBM was not found. Type 6 was the most common CBM type. There was no significant correlation between the age and gender of patients with FNM. There were significant differences between the clivus length, the angle between the clivus and the dens axis, the anteroposterior diameter of the foramen magnum, and gender. Also, there was a significant difference between the angle between the clivus and the foramen magnum and age. Conclusions The anatomical variations of the clivus are rare and important for the oral and maxillofacial radiologist to make the differential diagnosis. These anatomical variations should not be confused with pathologic formations. The morphological measurements and anatomical variations of the clivus can be evaluated in detail on CT images.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0040-1722712
dc.identifier.endpageE82en_US
dc.identifier.issn2193-6331
dc.identifier.issn2193-634X
dc.identifier.pmid35833004
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101326156
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpageE75en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722712
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38609
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000619254900002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThieme Medical Publishing Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B-Skull Baseen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatomical Variationen_US
dc.subjectClivusen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectSkull Baseen_US
dc.titleMorphological Measurement and Anatomical Variations of the Clivus Using Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files