Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.

Publication:
Comparison of the Heat Generation of Light Curing Units

dc.authorscopusid24528255500
dc.authorscopusid6507406448
dc.authorscopusid14068418700
dc.authorscopusid23568994700
dc.contributor.authorBağış, B.
dc.contributor.authorBaǧiş, Y.
dc.contributor.authorErtaş, E.
dc.contributor.authorUstaomer, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:24:48Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:24:48Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Bağış] Bora, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey,; [Baǧiş] Yildirim Hakan, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Ertaş] Ertan, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ustaomer] Seda, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the heat generation of three different types of light curing units. Methods and Materials: Temperature increases were recorded from a distance of 1 mm from a thermocouple to the tip of three different types of light curing units including one quartz-tungsten halogen (QTH), one plasma arc (PAC), and one light emitting diode (LED) unit. An experimental model was designed to fix the 1 mm distance between the tip of the light curing units and the thermocouple wire. Temperature changes were recorded in 10 second intervals up to 40 seconds. (10, 20, 30, and 40 seconds). Temperature measurements were repeated three times for every light curing unit after a one hour standby period. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni Test. Results: The highest temperature rises (54.4±1.65°C) occurred during activation of a PAC light curing unit for every test period (p<.05). The least temperature increase (11.8±1.3°C) occurred with a LED curing unit for each tested period except for the measurement of the temperature rise using the QTH curing unit at the tenth second interval (p<.05). Conclusion: These results indicate the choice of light activation unit and curing time is important when polymerizing light activated resin based restorations to avoid any thermal damage to the pulp.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5005/jcdp-9-2-65
dc.identifier.endpage72en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-3711
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18264527
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-39449100927
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage65en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-9-2-65
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Dental Practiceen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Contemporary Dental Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHeat Generationen_US
dc.subjectLight Curing Unitsen_US
dc.subjectPulp Damageen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Heat Generation of Light Curing Unitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files