Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.

Publication:
Alternative Approach to Evaluating Lumbar Lordosis on Direct Roentgenograms: Projection Area per Length Squared

dc.authorscopusid22333972200
dc.authorscopusid7103170409
dc.authorscopusid7403238396
dc.contributor.authorKuru, O.
dc.contributor.authorSahin, B.
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T21:21:59Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kuru] Ömer, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sahin] Bunyamin, Department of Anatomy, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kaplan] Süleyman, Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractSeveral methods have been described to evaluate the degree of lumbar lordosis. However, suggested methods have used non-standardized terminology and landmarks to measure the degree of lumbar lordosis. In the present study a practical method for evaluating the degree of lumbar lordosis is described and, for this purpose, 24 lateral roentgenograms were obtained retrospectively from the archive of Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. The length between the superior and inferior angles of the first and fifth lumbar vertebral bodies, and the area behind the lumbar vertebral bodies, were estimated using the point counting and planimetry methods. A new unit, the projection area per length squared (PAL) was described on lateral roentgenograms. The planimetric approach was used as the gold standard in the present study. The point-counting method was also used to estimate the PAL and it was repeated three times to determine the variability of the technique. To evaluate the estimates' accuracy, the results of point-counting were compared with those of the planimetry methods. The PAL changed by between 3.93 and 13.59% for the examined subjects. A high correlation was also noted between the results of the point-counting and planimetry methods (r = 0.997). It is concluded that the PAL approach could provide accurate and reproducible data for evaluating the degree of lumbar lordosis and low back pain. © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Japanese Association of Anatomists.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00210.x
dc.identifier.endpage88en_US
dc.identifier.issn1447-6959
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18507617.0
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-42449157936
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage83en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00210.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/34656
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnatomical Science Internationalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLateral Roentgenogramsen_US
dc.subjectLength Squareden_US
dc.subjectLumbar Lordosisen_US
dc.subjectPlanimetryen_US
dc.subjectPoint-Countingen_US
dc.titleAlternative Approach to Evaluating Lumbar Lordosis on Direct Roentgenograms: Projection Area per Length Squareden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files