Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.

Publication:
Embedded Instruction for Young Children with Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Experimental Research Studies

dc.authorscopusid57207760508
dc.authorscopusid39362775300
dc.authorscopusid35743835800
dc.authorwosidYucesoy Ozkan, Serife/Aaa-4138-2021
dc.authorwosidRakap, Salih/Aah-7319-2019
dc.contributor.authorGulboy, Emra
dc.contributor.authorYucesoy-Ozkan, Serife
dc.contributor.authorRakap, Salih
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:45:09Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Gulboy, Emra; Rakap, Salih] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Special Educ, Samsun, Turkey; [Yucesoy-Ozkan, Serife] Osmangazi Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Special Educ, Eskisehir, Turkey; [Rakap, Salih] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Sch Educ, Dept Specialized Educ Serv, Greensboro, NC USA; [Gulboy, Emra] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Special Educ, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractEmbedded instruction is a recommended practice to support development and learning of young children with disabilities in inclusive early childhood settings and natural environments. The number of individual studies investigating the impact of embedded interventions on child learning outcomes has increased in recent years. In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the methodological quality, characteristics, and effects of single-case experimental research studies focused on embedded instruction to determine whether the evidence from these studies suggest embedded instruction as an evidence-based practice for young children with disabilities. We evaluated rigor of the studies using What Works Clearinghouse (2017) design standards and quality indicators of single-case experimental research, and calculated treatment effect estimates using Tau-U. A total of 10 single-case experimental research studies with 21 participants published between 1993 and 2017 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and metaanalysis. The studies were conducted by seven different research groups with no overlapping authorship at seven different institutions across two countries. The mean treatment effect of embedded instruction on child learning outcomes across the 10 studies was .80. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide sufficient evidence to consider embedded instruction as an evidence-based practice for young children with disabilities and to support its continued use in enhancing the development and learning of young children with disabilities in inclusive early childhood settings. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexSocial Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.12.014
dc.identifier.endpage193en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-2006
dc.identifier.issn1873-7706
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85144472996
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage181en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.12.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38922
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000904636300007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Childhood Research Quarterlyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInclusionen_US
dc.subjectEmbedded Instructionen_US
dc.subjectYoung Children With Disabilitiesen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Practiceen_US
dc.subjectMeta-Analysisen_US
dc.titleEmbedded Instruction for Young Children with Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Experimental Research Studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files